Kevin M. Cahill
Position
Professor, Philosophy
Affiliation
Short info
Research
My main interests are in Skepticism, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Wittgenstein, Early Analytic Philosophy, and in the relationship between Analytic and Continental philosophy.
Teaching
Philosophy of Language
Wittgenstein
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
Origins of Analytic Philosophy
Existentialism
Publications
Books -
(Editor) Wittgenstein on Practice: Back to the Rough Ground (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)
Towards a Philosophical Anthropology of Culture: Naturalism, Relativism, and Skepticism (Routledge: New York, 2021)
Co-editor with Thomas Raleigh, Wittgenstein and Naturalism (New York: Routledge, 2018)
Co-editor with Martin Gustafsson and Thomas Schwarz-Wenzer, Finite but Unbounded: New Essays in Philosophical Anthropology, Berlin Studies in Knowledge Research (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2017)
The Fate of Wonder: Wittgenstein鈥檚 Critique of Metaphysics and Modernity (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011)
Co-editor with Lene Johannessen Considering Class: Essays on The Discourse of the American Dream (Lit-Verlag: Berlin, 2007)
Papers -
鈥淲ittgensteinian Political Quietism and Rawls鈥 Political Liberalism鈥
鈥淎voiding 鈥楾ack-on鈥 Theories of Culture鈥 in Wittgenstein on Practice, ed. Kevin M. Cahill (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2024) 287-216
鈥淭丑别 Tractatus and the Carnapian Conception of Syntax鈥 in The Tractatus at 100, eds. Martin Stokhof and Hao Tang (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2023), 119-142.
鈥淭ractarian Ethics" in The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, 2nd ed. (eds.) Hans Sluga and David Stern (Cambridge: Cambridge, 2017) 96-125
鈥溾楢 Purely Self-Regarding Ethics鈥: Response to Sluga鈥 in Ed Dain and Reshef Agam-Segal (eds.) Wittgenstein鈥檚 Moral Thought (London: Routledge, 2017) 223-245
鈥淎 Degenerate Case of Action鈥 in Finite but Unbounded: New Essays in Philosophical Anthropology, Berlin Studies in Knowledge Research, (de Gruyter, 2017) 119-132
鈥淭丑别 Habitus, Coping Practices and the Search for the Ground of Action鈥, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 46 (5):498-524
鈥淲ittgenstein鈥檚 Paganism鈥 in Mark Bevir and Andrius Galisanka, eds., Ludwig Wittgenstein and Normative Inquiry (Leiden: Brill, 2016) 174-191
鈥淨uietism or Description? McDowell in Dispute with Dreyfus鈥, The Review of Metaphysics 68 (December 2014) 395-409
鈥淣aturalism and the Friends of Understanding鈥 Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 44(4), 2014, 460-477
鈥30. Dezember 1929, Zu Heidegger: Was Konnte Wittgenstein sich Denken?鈥 in Ungesellige Geselligkeiten/Unsocial Sociabilities, ed. Esther Ramharter (Berlin: Parerga Verlag, 2011) 97-118
"Explanation, Wonder, and the Cultural Point of the Tractatus鈥
Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift, vol. 44, no. 3-4, 2009, 206-217
鈥淲ittgenstein and the Fate of Metaphysics鈥
Sats: Nordic Journal of Philosophy, vol. 9, no. 2. pp. 61-73
鈥淏ildung and Decline鈥
Philosophical Investigations, 32:1 January, 2009, 23-43
鈥淓lucidation, Meta-Philosophy, and Hacker鈥檚 Use of 鈥楨xternal Evidence鈥欌
Journal of Philosophical Research, Volume 33, 2008, 73-99
Co-editor with Lene Johannessen
Considering Class: Essays on The Discourse of the American Dream
Lit-Verlag: Berlin, 2007
鈥淭丑别 Concept of Progress in Wittgenstein鈥檚 Thought鈥
Review of Metaphysics, September, 2006, Volume LX (1), 71-100
鈥淲hat Kripke Missed: The Antinomical Structure of the Remarks on Rule-following鈥 Ludwig Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy: Papers of the Conference on the Occasion of the 115th Anniversaryof his Birth (Sofia, 2005) 22-34
鈥淓thics and the Tractatus: A Resolute Failure鈥
Philosophy, January, 2004, Volume 79 (1), 2004, 33-55
鈥淭丑别 Tractatus, Ethics, and Authenticity鈥
Journal of Philosophical Research, Volume 29, 2004, 267-288
Projects
Main Collaborator and Co-Applicant (Project Leader, Sorin Bangu)
鈥淢athematics with a Human Face鈥
Norwegian Research Council Fripro-Frihumsam Research Grant
2019-2023
kevin-cahill
From 2010 to 2013 I was project leader of the NordForsk Nordic Network for Philosophical Anthropology
My current work examines the problem of skepticism from an anthropological and historical perspective.